<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBS CH vs. Rota Formula</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fakewheels.com/2009/03/bbs-ch-vs-rota-formula/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fakewheels.com/2009/03/bbs-ch-vs-rota-formula/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 19:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://fakewheels.com/2009/03/bbs-ch-vs-rota-formula/comment-page-1/#comment-2137</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakewheels.com/?p=394#comment-2137</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you should compare the CH&#039;s to these reps instead:
http://www.usarim.com/volkswagen-wheels-sku-320-18-inch-silver-rims-p-1263.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should compare the CH&#8217;s to these reps instead:<br />
<a href="http://www.usarim.com/volkswagen-wheels-sku-320-18-inch-silver-rims-p-1263.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usarim.com/volkswagen-wheels-sku-320-18-inch-silver-rims-p-1263.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twistedsymphony</title>
		<link>http://fakewheels.com/2009/03/bbs-ch-vs-rota-formula/comment-page-1/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>twistedsymphony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakewheels.com/?p=394#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>john is right...  out of the 5 comparisons I&#039;ve looked up today FakeWheels.com got 3 of them wrong... all replicas but compared to the wrong wheel. Do they think these companies are just that bad or do they really just not do their homework... I thought the whole point of a site like this was to point out the subtle differences to tell the reals from the fakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>john is right&#8230;  out of the 5 comparisons I&#8217;ve looked up today FakeWheels.com got 3 of them wrong&#8230; all replicas but compared to the wrong wheel. Do they think these companies are just that bad or do they really just not do their homework&#8230; I thought the whole point of a site like this was to point out the subtle differences to tell the reals from the fakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://fakewheels.com/2009/03/bbs-ch-vs-rota-formula/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakewheels.com/?p=394#comment-388</guid>
		<description>the rota is a bbs re clone, not ch clone. i wish rota would make a ch clone. i prefer it to the re</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the rota is a bbs re clone, not ch clone. i wish rota would make a ch clone. i prefer it to the re</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://fakewheels.com/2009/03/bbs-ch-vs-rota-formula/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fakewheels.com/?p=394#comment-127</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to disagree with this being an all-out fake of the CH, maybe it&#039;s just the photos but it seems the Rota&#039;s have very different, slightly more edgy styling while still being split spoke. The CH on the other hand are more organic looking with smoother edges and more curve to the way the spokes split. It really seems the only things these wheels have in common are split spokes (not an uncommon design element) and choices with centercaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to disagree with this being an all-out fake of the CH, maybe it&#8217;s just the photos but it seems the Rota&#8217;s have very different, slightly more edgy styling while still being split spoke. The CH on the other hand are more organic looking with smoother edges and more curve to the way the spokes split. It really seems the only things these wheels have in common are split spokes (not an uncommon design element) and choices with centercaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

